It’s an all out war between the Kardashians and MTv for gossip rag coverage this week (at least we’re done with the Gosselins). For some reason, I blame MTv for the Kardashians in the first place, though I’m not sure why. A few comments:
- I don’t care whether your wedding was real or fake, Khloe. I don’t need to hear from you that it was. Or from Lamar. Or from Kourtney, Kim, or your mom. Even Brody’s getting into the mix. Maybe once I hear it from Kylie or Kendall, I’ll believe it. Maybe.
- Kourtney, have this damn baby already.
- Yes, Kim, we know you’re back with Reggie. And that the love exhibited on Sunday at Khloe’s wedding made you realize just how much you loved him and how much you missed him. Gag. Me with a spoon.
- Lauren Conrad has a movie deal for her book LA Candy. Admittedly, I read the first chapter one afternoon when I was hanging out at Barnes and Noble. Can’t wait to see who they cast.
- Kristin Cavallari should not be judgey judgey about Audrina’s plastic surgery (or lack thereof). She really is a B, as evidenced by her debut on The Hills yesterday. Wow, who knew that show needed to be revamped? Or retramped?
- And this, this has to be the worst…and on MSNBC, no less!
Kris Jenner needs to step up her media blasting gig and get her girls in the news with some more varied stories…but, what’s left, really? (Aside from the impending divorce of Khloe and Lamar and, perhaps, the twist that Scott is not really the father of Kourtney’s baby)
And, while I’m here, can I just put it on the record that
- Adrienne Bailon, Cheetah Girl or not, really irks me
- Justin Bobby needs to shave immediately
- There’s a lot to say about The City, too, but I can’t right now
- I don’t understand why everyone on these MTv shows has to have a title (ie “Spencer’s sister,” “Brody’s friend,” “Audrina’s ex-boyfriend”)…why can’t they just be who they are? Pigeonhole…
in the mud, I am going to say that even looking at these models annoyed me. Do they think they look cool in their shiny Members Only style jackets? (Speaking of, is a real Members Only jacket considered vintage? Because it’s from the 80s? I’m from the 70s and, while I feel old, I am far from vintage.) They pride themselves on being hip (go figure) and original, but you know they’re sporting those jackets with a pair of Uggs. And a skirt. In the summer.
These fashion choices that litter the American Apparel website were “cool” back when I was a mere tyke because, well, there weren’t any other choices. There are so many choices now, why go with the
called them leotards and we wore them to gymnastics and ballet) that would make even make Olivia Newton John cringe? Is it wrong that I just don’t see the appeal in this whole, for lack of a better word, movement? I may be wrong, but I feel like when you try hard to look like you’re not trying hard, when you have the I don’t care/laissez faire attitude emblazoned on your unsmiling face (